National Sponsors


National Lacrosse Participation Tops 720,000 in 2012

BALTIMORE — A record total of 722,205 players competed on organized lacrosse teams in 2012, as reported in the annual US Lacrosse Participation Report released today. The growth rate from last year (683,730) was 5.5 percent, marking the ninth straight year of at least five percent growth.

More than half of the participants (389,275) compete at the youth level, representing a 7.8 percent growth rate from last year. Roughly 65 percent of the youth players are boys, but both genders have seen significant increases in participation in recent years. Over the last five years at the youth level, the number of boys playing has increased 62 percent and the number of girls playing has increased 61 percent.

Lacrosse continues to be the fastest-growing sport at the high school level, and a total of 282,148 players competed in 2012. According to data from the NFHS, from 2007 to 2012, a total of 750 schools added boys’ teams and 638 schools added girls’ teams. Those figures represent a 47 percent increase in the number of boys’ programs and a 43 percent increase in the number of girls’ programs, easily outdistancing bowling, which is the second-fastest growing sport with an 18 percent growth rate for boys and a 22 percent growth rate for girls.

Lacrosse is also the fastest-growing NCAA sport, and nearly 35,000 players competed on varsity, club or junior college teams in 2012. Thirty new varsity programs were added in 2012, including the University of Michigan’s men’s team, the first school with a Bowl Championship Series (BCS) football program to add men’s lacrosse since 1981.

US Lacrosse has produced the Participation Report annually since 2001, and over that time span the number of players has grown 184 percent, from 253,901 to 722,205. This survey counts only play on organized teams, and does not count leisure-time play of the sport.

The primary source of data for this report is provided by the 64 US Lacrosse regional chapters. Each chapter reports detailed participation at the youth level, and significant data is also obtained from US Lacrosse membership records, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the National Federation of State High School Associations and (Source:

10 Myths about Boy’s Lacrosse Rules - Part 1

By Paul Espinosa  

As an official for 21 years, I am always amazed at how certain myths become a part of the lacrosse culture when it comes to rules and officiating.

As we start the season, I thought it would be a good idea to provide you with a list of 10 common myths related to lacrosse rules. Officials are never perfect, but good officials always strive to become better and for the most part officials get the calls right. This goal of this article is not to defend all officials, but educate fans and develop a culture of sportsmanship.

Myth 1 – They only have 2 back, they must be off-sides.  

Officiating offside is one of the hardest things for an official to do, especially if the official is new or never played the game. With 20 players on the field and so many others in the bench area available to substitute on the fly, keeping up with who has 4 back (clearing team) and who has 3 back (riding or new defense team) and making this call on a moment’s notice is very hard. Officials also have to be cautious because if they blow the whistle to early and end up being wrong, it could result in a lost scoring opportunity for the attacking team.  For a team to be offside by rule an attacking team must have 7 or more players in their attack half of the field. It is not enough to call offside only because a team only has 2 back. There could be another substitute in the bench area.

Please also keep in mind that calling an offside on games with only 2 officials is not as big of a priority as making sure we do not miss a foul call against the player who has the ball or a potentially dangerous off-ball hit.

Myth 2 – Player lifting his arm is a ward.

From the High School Federation Rulebook – 6-11-1 – “A player in possession of the ball shall not use his free hand or arm or any other part of his body to hold, push or control the direction of the movement of the crosse or body of the player applying the check.”

Oftentimes we see a defender poke his stick into the underarm area of the attacking player with the ball. We then will see the attack player lift his arm and then tuck his arm back under the stick of the defender in an effort to continue to protect his own stick or put his hand back on his own stick. We hear “ward” so many times, and it is just not true. The player with the ball must extend his arm and push away the stick for a ward to be called by an official. Additionally, a ward can be called if the attacker runs into the defender and pushes him away (Bull Dodge).

Myth 3 – A stick-on-stick check cannot be called a slash, or contact on the head is a slash.

Most people see and understand a slash should be a true “blow” or “strike” to the head, back, body or arm. Depending on the level of play, most officials will allow one or two light contacts to the free arm with a warning of “get stick” or “stay off the arm.” However, it is possible to call a stick-on-stick check a slash. Also, not all contact with the stick to the opponent’s head is a slash. This is most often seen when a defender pokes his stick towards the attacking players and as he raises his stick, it comes in contact with the front of the mask of the attacking player. This is another one of those really tough calls. The judgment of the official is key here - was it a strike or blow or was it minor contact (brush)?  Another factor that has come into play in recent years is the attacking player “acting” with that incidental contact to try and draw a slash call. Officials as a whole have not done a good job in discouraging this practice and using the rule book when needed. You see there is a foul in the book that is called Illegal Procedure – faking or feigning a foul, and should be considered misconduct.

Also not called enough by officials at the youth and high school level is the “uncontrolled” swinging of the stick. I also call this swinging with reckless abandon. This must be called a slash, and calls like these should be supported by the coaches, fans and players to ensure player safety. It could be called even if the slash does not touch the opponent in any way.

Myth 4 – Contact with the goalie’s stick when he is entirely outside the crease is interference.

Playing around the crease is very exciting, however the rules about when a goalie can be checked is often misunderstood. What makes this situation worse is that teams and fans are often 40 yards or more away and cannot see everything. Here are some easy reminders about playing the ball or goalie around the crease:

·      As long as the goalie has any part of his body in the crease, his body can NEVER be touched

·      The goalie’s stick can only be checked in 2 situations:

o   If the part of his stick that is being checked is outside the cylinder of the crease and the ball is not in his crosse. This means if the goalie is clamped over the ball outside the crease, the part of the stick outside the crease can be checked.

o   If the goalie is 100% outside his crease he is considered a field player and his stick can be checked if the ball is in his stick or within 5 yards of a loss ball.

·      If the goalie has possession of the ball and any part of his body is touching the crease he is 100% off limits. Please note this does not apply to a defender who has the ball in the crease, his stick can still be checked but the attacking player may still not enter the crease.


Myth 5 – It is an illegal screen simply because the attacking team is moving and forces the defender to run around him.

Moving Screens (Illegal Screens) – just because a player is moving and a defender runs around him does not mean that is an illegal screen. For an Illegal screen to be called there must be contact made by the defender with the person setting the screen. Also the stick of the person setting the screen must be within the frame (shoulder width) of the body of the screener.  

Tune in next month for part 2 of this article, which will outline 5 additional common myths in the game of lacrosse.

Hope this helps start the season off with a better understanding of the rules. Good Luck this season and stay safe!

About the author - Paul Espinosa is on the board of the Illinois Chapter of US Lacrosse representing the boy’s/men’s game officials. Paul is a 21 year lacrosse official and currently works NCAA Division I, II, III contests. He has worked in the NCAA playoffs for over 10 years. He also currently serves on the US Lacrosse National Men’s Officials Training Committee.  You can send questions to


Triple-Impact Competitor Scholarships


PCA's Triple-Impact Competitor®Scholarship Program Sponsored by Deloitte awards scholarships to dozens of high school athletes, based on their essays explaining how they represent the ideal of the Triple-Impact Competitor as defined in Elevating Your Game: Becoming a Triple-Impact Competitor by PCA Founder Jim Thompson:

-Personal Mastery: Making oneself better

-Leadership: Making one's teammates better

-Honoring the Game: Making the game better.

Eligibility extends to high school juniors (class of 2014) in these areas described within the rules and area section below
Chicago Area:Counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry and Will.
A Triple-Impact Competitor makes positive contributions on three levels:

-Makes oneself better (Personal Mastery);

-Makes teammates better (Leadership); and

-Makes the sport better (Honoring the Game).

Completed Applications
A completed application comprises:

-Triple-Impact Competitor Scholarship Application

-One testimonial from a school administrator (athletic director, teacher, counselor, etc.)

-One testimonial from a coach

-At least one testimonial (and up to three) by individuals who are familiar with the student-athlete and able to speak to his/her embodiment of the Triple-Impact Competitor principles (for example fellow teammates, competitors, referees etc.)              

All testimonials should be submitted online via the applicant's personalized link. The personalized link is sent directly to the applicant in a confirmation email once he/she has completed the online application.
For more information or if you cannot locate your personalized link, please e-mail Sonja DeWitt with your full name to request the link again.

Selection and Notification
The Triple-Impact Competitor Scholarship Program Selection Committee will select award recipients. The number of scholarships will vary by region. All scholarship finalists will be notified via email in August, 2013. Scholarship winners will be announced at awards events in Autumn, 2013.